CO2 affect the climate for a long time. Therefore, remaining global CO2 budgets correspond to certain limits of global warming. Here are key statements from the IPCC's Sixth Assessment Report on remaining CO2 budgets.
Which concrete global budget we want to orientate, however, must ultimately be decided politically on the basis of the current state of scientific knowledge.
Such a global budget raises the question of how it can be distributed amongst the countries in a fair and economically reasonable way. Such a distribution should be an important guidance of the ratchet up mechanism (ambition mechanism) of the Paris Agreement with Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs).
Here, two models including tools are presented that involve distributing a global budget and determining national paths:
Tools based on the Regensburg Model Scenario Types are also offered for the determination of emission paths that are compatible with a predefined budget.
With the help of the Regensburg Model Scenario Types, global or national emission paths can be determined that meet a given budget. The scenario types differ in the assumption about the property of the annual reductions. The emission paths are therefore indirectly determined essentially via the annual reductions (here are exemplary courses). This approach is particularly useful when it comes to making political decisions about emission paths.
Web app: http://paths.climate-calculator.info
Publication: Zenodo, Mathematical Description of the Regensburg Model Scenario Types RM 1 – 6
Web app: http://RM.climate-calculator.info
Publications:Web apps
Publications:
Regensburg Model (RM) |
Extended Smooth Pathway Model (ESPM) |
|||
download Excel tool from Zenodo platform | ||||
preview ot the tool in the browser | ||||
instruction for the tool | ||||
method | national paths are derived from a global path using the Regensburg Formula | national paths are derived that adhere to a given national budget | ||
allocation approach | converging per capita emissions (example) | weighted distribution key for a global budget with "emissions" and "population" as factors to be weighted | ||
selectable parameter to map climate justice |
convergence level | weighting population | ||
emission paths | The Regensburg Model Scenario Types (RM 1 - 6) are used to derive paths that are compatible with a specified budget. ► see mathematical description of the RM Scenario Types: ; exemplary courses |
|||
scenario types RM 1 - 6 are used to determine global emission paths | scenario types RM 1 - 6 are used to determine national emission paths | |||
data base | EDGAR: With this database, the EU provides the emissions of all countries in the world due to the use of fos-sil fuels (excluding international shipping and aviation; ISA) and cement production. For the handling of land-use change emissions (LUC) in the tools, see this paper: |
|||
exemplary results | global CO2 budget 2020 - 2100 |
Here you will find results in the ESPM with different framework data:
|
||
400 Gt |
||||
550 Gt |
||||
650 Gt |
||||
further here specified parameters: | ||||
minimum global emission in Gt | -0.7 |
|||
convergence level in t/capita | 0.5 |
|||
relationship between ESPM and RM |
Depending on the chosen global path and the chosen convergence level, there is an implicit weighting of the population in the resulting national budgets across all countries in the RM (see proof in the mathematical description). The use of this implicit weighting as an explicit weighting in the ESPM leads to very similar results as in the RM. The results in the RM can therefore also be generated in the ESPM if the weighting of the population is specified accordingly. The implicit weighting can be calculated in the RM tool and is given above in the examplary results in the RM for all countries in the world. | |||
last publication | Calculation of Paris-compatible emission targets for the six largest emitters |
|||
- published on Zenodo |
- published on Zenodo |
|||
web apps | ||||
ESPM approach: Set budget and determine emission paths |
||
determine global paths |
determine global or national paths
|
|
download Excel tool from Zenodo platform | ||
preview ot the tool in the browser | ||
instruction for the tool | ||
background | In determining plausible global emission paths, the challenge before which we aside is particularly evident. Therfore we have decoupled determining smooth global paths in a separate tool. |
With this simple tool, global or national emission paths can be derived that meet a specified budget. This tool is particularly suitable if |
additional feature | Contains the illustrative IPCC SR1.5 paths P1 - P4 (LED, S1, S2, S5). | |
data base |
|
The tool does not contain any data. The required data for all countries in the world can be provided with the following tools:
|
exemplary results | Here you will find some results for the EU and Germany with different framework data. | |
method | The tools uses the Regensburg Model Scenario Types (RM 1 - 6) to determine emission paths that are compatible with a given budget. These sceanrio types differ in the assumption about the property of the annual changes (see mathematical description: ; exemplary courses). | |
last publication | Berechnung Paris-kompatibler Emissionspfade mit dem ESPM am Beispiel Deutschlands und der EU ; published on Zenodo | |
web apps | only RM-6 (linear paths): |
|
Resource sharing models directly address the allocation of a remaining global budget. This article will therefore give an overview of the properties of resource sharing models that, in principle, use current emissions and population as a distribution key. The following models are compared: Regensburg Model (Regensburg Formula), Contraction & Convergence (C&C), Smooth Pathway Models (Smooth Pathway Formula from Raupach and Extended Smooth Pathway Model), Chakravarty et al. (cap per capita emissions), Höhne et al. (common but differentiated convergence; CDC).
Some Excel tools contain macros. You can remove the macros by saving the downloaded xlsm file as an xlsx file. The key macro "Goal Seek" has the function of determining the free parameters in the scenario types in such a way that the specified budget is adhered to. You then have to do this individually for each scenario type in the sheet "goal seek" using the target value search (goal seek) integrated in Excel.
On request, the macros can be provided as text or bas files for self-integration. Please contact us: save-the-climate@online.ms (mail to).
We have published the code of the macro "Goal Seek" and the corresponding bas file on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7494168.